Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 4:38 am
The Shadowlands would be a hell of a project for the Frat for the next gaz...
Welcome, friends, to our establishment.
http://fraternityofshadows.com/forum/
True, but Lysander was already undead at that point, by the same process that created the first Ahltrian, though somehow (Perhaps by the blessings of his goddess, Brigit) semi-free-willed except when Ebonbane chose to dominate him. So he wasn't really "killed" in the normal sense, but destroyed.DeepShadow wrote:I don't know about Corona, but IIRC anyone killed in the area of the Ahltrian becomes a ghoul. Perhaps they didn't know that death wasn't the end?
Something got cut off there, John.Mangrum wrote:* The general thrust of adventuring in the domain is the conflict between the human evil of Elena Faith-hold and the monstrous, all-consuming evil of Ebonbane, and the prospects of Elena's once again being offered a true evil to fight. What would her reaction be? Meanwhile, Ebonbane is monomaniacally fixated on destroying and/or desecrating everything th
Doesn't that sort of clash a little with what's been established with Addar (being Kateri's mount, that is)? I'm thinking of his entry in one of the BoS netbooks. I can see a rework that would incorporate it. And I only mention this because of a certain Lady of the Lake was mentioned in the BoS series before making an official appearance (to my knowledge, anyway) in a Gazetteer complete with the history established in the netbook.Mangrum wrote:* Pseduodomains -- pearls in the oil, I think I called them in the RL DMG -- include Kateri's unicorn mount Addar, now driven mad and equally lost in overweening pride and self-loathing. His 'domain' is a small glade that travels with him. He can act as a guide for those who play to his vanity.
Yeah, in the post I mentioned regarding Forenoon Abbey, Mangrum put in a line to try to reconcile that. "Addar was once a steed for a paladin in the Circle, but accounts differ on exactly whom he served." Mangrum also mentioned it here:Tykus wrote:Doesn't that sort of clash a little with what's been established with Addar (being Kateri's mount, that is)? I'm thinking of his entry in one of the BoS netbooks. I can see a rework that would incorporate it.
Actually, the Lady first appeared in Servants of Darkness (1998) before getting fleshed out in the Book of Shadows (2000). But you're right, lots of stuff from the BoS series did make it into the 3e line (the Ezra info in Anchors of Faith, and the Council of Brilliance come to mind).And I only mention this because of a certain Lady of the Lake was mentioned in the BoS series before making an official appearance (to my knowledge, anyway) in a Gazetteer complete with the history established in the netbook.
When it came to the BoSes and canon:Tykus wrote:Mangrum wrote:Doesn't that sort of clash a little with what's been established with Addar (being Kateri's mount, that is)? I'm thinking of his entry in one of the BoS netbooks. I can see a rework that would incorporate it. And I only mention this because of a certain Lady of the Lake was mentioned in the BoS series before making an official appearance (to my knowledge, anyway) in a Gazetteer complete with the history established in the netbook.
Except that in his original appearance, he's described as too arrogant to tolerate any rider. Yes, one could argue that the elf-maid simply didn't live up to his high standards, after Kateri ... but should we re-invent him that much?DeepShadow wrote:I think this can easily be reconciled by saying that Addar had a rider before the events in the BoSac.