Category talk:Hell Hound - Revision history

Cure at 19:17, 21 February 2010

2010-02-21T19:17:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:17, 21 February 2010
Line 12:		Line 12:

	PS - (And considering Mangrum's last post on the subject: '"Clarify reality wrinkles again" is on my to-do list right after "Hammer rusty nails into eye sockets."' I doubt we'll get any more of an exhaustive answer than that. -- [[User:Gonzoron\|Gonzoron]] 16:30, 21 February 2010 (UTC)		PS - (And considering Mangrum's last post on the subject: '"Clarify reality wrinkles again" is on my to-do list right after "Hammer rusty nails into eye sockets."' I doubt we'll get any more of an exhaustive answer than that. -- [[User:Gonzoron\|Gonzoron]] 16:30, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

			Perhaps my suspicion that Mangrum was the answers behind "Azalin"'s throne has been disproved. A dread nightmare has the Evil descriptor, does not have the Mist descriptior, and does not have reality wrinkles:

			Form the Errata: "Descriptors correct as presented. The sentence "Though dread nightmares are in some ways more powerful than their infernal kin, the Mists have bound them to earth." is intended to imply that over the course of generations, these creatures have lost their wrinkles. They do not have reality wrinkles (precision given by Azalin)" [Errata]

			Now on a related and practical point, where is a Hell Hound or a Dread Night for that matter to put its phylactery? Do hounds hounds come into existence in Ravenloft with dog collars and nightmares with horseshoes? Granted, hell hounds might be intelligent enough to bury a phlactery and a nightmare would be intelligent enough to do likewise. Still, phlacteries are tool-like and so fit together better with tool using creatures. Seeking out and digging up hell hound phlacteries does have a certain appeal I will admit however. . . .[[User:Cure\|Cure]] 19:17, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Gonzoron at 16:30, 21 February 2010

2010-02-21T16:30:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:30, 21 February 2010
Line 10:		Line 10:

	Well, according to the FAQ and many annoyed posts from Mangrum and "Azalin," the criteria for RWs is very clear: "“An outsider receives a reality wrinkle if it has either the Good or the Evil descriptor and it does not have the Mists descriptor. An outsider loses its reality wrinkle if it "maxes out" its Corruption points (22+) or binds itself to a mortal (as in the case of outsider familiars)." I'd have to check RCS or RLPH to see if Phylacteries and RWs are linked. -- [[User:Gonzoron\|Gonzoron]] 16:27, 21 February 2010 (UTC)		Well, according to the FAQ and many annoyed posts from Mangrum and "Azalin," the criteria for RWs is very clear: "“An outsider receives a reality wrinkle if it has either the Good or the Evil descriptor and it does not have the Mists descriptor. An outsider loses its reality wrinkle if it "maxes out" its Corruption points (22+) or binds itself to a mortal (as in the case of outsider familiars)." I'd have to check RCS or RLPH to see if Phylacteries and RWs are linked. -- [[User:Gonzoron\|Gonzoron]] 16:27, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

			PS - (And considering Mangrum's last post on the subject: '"Clarify reality wrinkles again" is on my to-do list right after "Hammer rusty nails into eye sockets."' I doubt we'll get any more of an exhaustive answer than that. -- [[User:Gonzoron\|Gonzoron]] 16:30, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Gonzoron at 16:27, 21 February 2010

2010-02-21T16:27:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:27, 21 February 2010
Line 8:		Line 8:

	Let me change that to, I would be very surprised if they had phylacteries and likewise reality wrinkles. I keep wanting to think that it is either reality wrinkle or mist descriptor. But I believe that nightmares are one of the counterexamples to this line of thought. In brief, I have never understood this completely, or fully, or correctly, and would love if someone could treat it exhaustively.[[User:Cure\|Cure]] 11:54, 21 February 2010 (UTC)		Let me change that to, I would be very surprised if they had phylacteries and likewise reality wrinkles. I keep wanting to think that it is either reality wrinkle or mist descriptor. But I believe that nightmares are one of the counterexamples to this line of thought. In brief, I have never understood this completely, or fully, or correctly, and would love if someone could treat it exhaustively.[[User:Cure\|Cure]] 11:54, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

			Well, according to the FAQ and many annoyed posts from Mangrum and "Azalin," the criteria for RWs is very clear: "“An outsider receives a reality wrinkle if it has either the Good or the Evil descriptor and it does not have the Mists descriptor. An outsider loses its reality wrinkle if it "maxes out" its Corruption points (22+) or binds itself to a mortal (as in the case of outsider familiars)." I'd have to check RCS or RLPH to see if Phylacteries and RWs are linked. -- [[User:Gonzoron\|Gonzoron]] 16:27, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Cure at 11:54, 21 February 2010

2010-02-21T11:54:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:54, 21 February 2010
Line 6:		Line 6:

	Good point re: devil. I agree, no devil. But how do we know they don't have RWs or phylacteries? They have the Evil descriptor and not the Mists descriptor. Therefore they should have RWs. I'm not sure what the criteria for Phylacteries are. Can someone check RCS or RLPH? (mine are packed) -- [[User:Gonzoron\|Gonzoron]] 20:49, 20 February 2010 (UTC)		Good point re: devil. I agree, no devil. But how do we know they don't have RWs or phylacteries? They have the Evil descriptor and not the Mists descriptor. Therefore they should have RWs. I'm not sure what the criteria for Phylacteries are. Can someone check RCS or RLPH? (mine are packed) -- [[User:Gonzoron\|Gonzoron]] 20:49, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

			Let me change that to, I would be very surprised if they had phylacteries and likewise reality wrinkles. I keep wanting to think that it is either reality wrinkle or mist descriptor. But I believe that nightmares are one of the counterexamples to this line of thought. In brief, I have never understood this completely, or fully, or correctly, and would love if someone could treat it exhaustively.[[User:Cure\|Cure]] 11:54, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Gonzoron at 20:49, 20 February 2010

2010-02-20T20:49:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:49, 20 February 2010
Line 4:		Line 4:

	They aren't listed under Devil in the SRD, so I didn't put it down. They don't have relative wrinkles or phylacteries,if that is any help.[[User:Cure\|Cure]] 20:11, 20 February 2010 (UTC)		They aren't listed under Devil in the SRD, so I didn't put it down. They don't have relative wrinkles or phylacteries,if that is any help.[[User:Cure\|Cure]] 20:11, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

			Good point re: devil. I agree, no devil. But how do we know they don't have RWs or phylacteries? They have the Evil descriptor and not the Mists descriptor. Therefore they should have RWs. I'm not sure what the criteria for Phylacteries are. Can someone check RCS or RLPH? (mine are packed) -- [[User:Gonzoron\|Gonzoron]] 20:49, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Cure at 20:11, 20 February 2010

2010-02-20T20:11:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:11, 20 February 2010
Line 2:		Line 2:

	I suppose fiend. Maybe devil? I've been avoiding alignment descriptors since I can't think of a good way to differentiate between the descriptors and the alignments themselves. I wouldn't object to Fire. -- [[User:Gonzoron\|Gonzoron]] 20:08, 20 February 2010 (UTC)		I suppose fiend. Maybe devil? I've been avoiding alignment descriptors since I can't think of a good way to differentiate between the descriptors and the alignments themselves. I wouldn't object to Fire. -- [[User:Gonzoron\|Gonzoron]] 20:08, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

			They aren't listed under Devil in the SRD, so I didn't put it down. They don't have relative wrinkles or phylacteries,if that is any help.[[User:Cure\|Cure]] 20:11, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Gonzoron at 20:08, 20 February 2010

2010-02-20T20:08:22Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:08, 20 February 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Just Outsider or Fiend also? Also add Fire, Evil and Lawful?		Just Outsider or Fiend also? Also add Fire, Evil and Lawful?

			I suppose fiend. Maybe devil? I've been avoiding alignment descriptors since I can't think of a good way to differentiate between the descriptors and the alignments themselves. I wouldn't object to Fire. -- [[User:Gonzoron\|Gonzoron]] 20:08, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Cure at 18:40, 20 February 2010

2010-02-20T18:40:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:40, 20 February 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Just Outsider or Fiend also? Also add Fire?		Just Outsider or Fiend also? Also add Fire, Evil and Lawful?

Cure at 18:39, 20 February 2010

2010-02-20T18:39:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:39, 20 February 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Just Outsider or Fiend also?		Just Outsider or Fiend also? Also add Fire?

Cure: Created page with 'Just Outsider or Fiend also?'

2010-02-20T18:39:02Z

Created page with 'Just Outsider or Fiend also?'

New page

Just Outsider or Fiend also?