Category talk:Lycanthrope - Revision history

Cure at 15:12, 19 April 2010

2010-04-19T15:12:49Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:12, 19 April 2010
Line 12:		Line 12:
	::Agreed. I don't think we need infected and natural (and afflicted!) categories for each phenotype. A single label is fine. the point with the "Tree" is that every "folder" fits completely in every folder above it. So, since it's obviously true that all infected lycanthropes are lycanthropes, it's OK to put it there. Since only ''some'' infected lycanthropes are werewolves, it should NOT go in the werewolf category. But if, for example, Gennifer W-F is tagged with both werewolf and infected lycanthrope, (and human) both paths up the lycanthrope branch of the tree end up in the same place, so it's fine. The goal is that you can start at GWF's page and go up the tree as far as you like and you shouldn't find any category that she doesn't fit into. -- [[User:Gonzoron\|Gonzoron]] 19:11, 9 March 2010 (UTC)		::Agreed. I don't think we need infected and natural (and afflicted!) categories for each phenotype. A single label is fine. the point with the "Tree" is that every "folder" fits completely in every folder above it. So, since it's obviously true that all infected lycanthropes are lycanthropes, it's OK to put it there. Since only ''some'' infected lycanthropes are werewolves, it should NOT go in the werewolf category. But if, for example, Gennifer W-F is tagged with both werewolf and infected lycanthrope, (and human) both paths up the lycanthrope branch of the tree end up in the same place, so it's fine. The goal is that you can start at GWF's page and go up the tree as far as you like and you shouldn't find any category that she doesn't fit into. -- [[User:Gonzoron\|Gonzoron]] 19:11, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

	Mangrum's Lore needs to be cleaned up a bit further as it was not penned exclusively for Ravenloft (http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19546370/Monster_Lore_Compendium?post_id=332153698#332153698). In particular the conditions for a cure need to corrected. Note that I left the full moon stuff, as perhaps only at higher DC's does one realise that the literature ~~support~~ many different ~~triggeer~~ conditions.[[User:Cure\|Cure]]		Mangrum's Lore needs to be cleaned up a bit further as it was not penned exclusively for Ravenloft (http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19546370/Monster_Lore_Compendium?post_id=332153698#332153698). In particular the conditions for a cure need to corrected. Note that I left the full moon stuff, as perhaps only at higher DC's does one realise that the literature supports many different trigger conditions.[[User:Cure\|Cure]]

	Mangrum already noted on that thread that the chemical allergen part and the "full details of the cleansing cure" part are Ravenloft-specific. Since Mistipedia is Ravenloft-specific, I see no need to highlight them as he did by underlining. So I think its fine as is, no? -- [[User:Gonzoron\|Gonzoron]] 14:12, 19 April 2010 (UTC)		Mangrum already noted on that thread that the chemical allergen part and the "full details of the cleansing cure" part are Ravenloft-specific. Since Mistipedia is Ravenloft-specific, I see no need to highlight them as he did by underlining. So I think its fine as is, no? -- [[User:Gonzoron\|Gonzoron]] 14:12, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

			:I missed the full ritual stuff at the end. I did add "with luck" as success is not assured in Ravenloft.[[User:Cure\|Cure]] 15:12, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Gonzoron at 14:12, 19 April 2010

2010-04-19T14:12:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:12, 19 April 2010
Line 13:		Line 13:

	Mangrum's Lore needs to be cleaned up a bit further as it was not penned exclusively for Ravenloft (http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19546370/Monster_Lore_Compendium?post_id=332153698#332153698). In particular the conditions for a cure need to corrected. Note that I left the full moon stuff, as perhaps only at higher DC's does one realise that the literature support many different triggeer conditions.[[User:Cure\|Cure]]		Mangrum's Lore needs to be cleaned up a bit further as it was not penned exclusively for Ravenloft (http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19546370/Monster_Lore_Compendium?post_id=332153698#332153698). In particular the conditions for a cure need to corrected. Note that I left the full moon stuff, as perhaps only at higher DC's does one realise that the literature support many different triggeer conditions.[[User:Cure\|Cure]]

			Mangrum already noted on that thread that the chemical allergen part and the "full details of the cleansing cure" part are Ravenloft-specific. Since Mistipedia is Ravenloft-specific, I see no need to highlight them as he did by underlining. So I think its fine as is, no? -- [[User:Gonzoron\|Gonzoron]] 14:12, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Cure at 06:38, 16 April 2010

2010-04-16T06:38:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:38, 16 April 2010
Line 11:		Line 11:

	::Agreed. I don't think we need infected and natural (and afflicted!) categories for each phenotype. A single label is fine. the point with the "Tree" is that every "folder" fits completely in every folder above it. So, since it's obviously true that all infected lycanthropes are lycanthropes, it's OK to put it there. Since only ''some'' infected lycanthropes are werewolves, it should NOT go in the werewolf category. But if, for example, Gennifer W-F is tagged with both werewolf and infected lycanthrope, (and human) both paths up the lycanthrope branch of the tree end up in the same place, so it's fine. The goal is that you can start at GWF's page and go up the tree as far as you like and you shouldn't find any category that she doesn't fit into. -- [[User:Gonzoron\|Gonzoron]] 19:11, 9 March 2010 (UTC)		::Agreed. I don't think we need infected and natural (and afflicted!) categories for each phenotype. A single label is fine. the point with the "Tree" is that every "folder" fits completely in every folder above it. So, since it's obviously true that all infected lycanthropes are lycanthropes, it's OK to put it there. Since only ''some'' infected lycanthropes are werewolves, it should NOT go in the werewolf category. But if, for example, Gennifer W-F is tagged with both werewolf and infected lycanthrope, (and human) both paths up the lycanthrope branch of the tree end up in the same place, so it's fine. The goal is that you can start at GWF's page and go up the tree as far as you like and you shouldn't find any category that she doesn't fit into. -- [[User:Gonzoron\|Gonzoron]] 19:11, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

			Mangrum's Lore needs to be cleaned up a bit further as it was not penned exclusively for Ravenloft (http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19546370/Monster_Lore_Compendium?post_id=332153698#332153698). In particular the conditions for a cure need to corrected. Note that I left the full moon stuff, as perhaps only at higher DC's does one realise that the literature support many different triggeer conditions.[[User:Cure\|Cure]]

Gonzoron at 19:11, 9 March 2010

2010-03-09T19:11:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:11, 9 March 2010
Line 9:		Line 9:

	:I was thinking it should fit into the tree, rather than stand beside it. But putting it into the tree leads to unpleasantnesss, as one ends up with werewolf infected and werewolf natural, etc.[[User:Cure\|Cure]] 06:09, 9 March 2010 (UTC)		:I was thinking it should fit into the tree, rather than stand beside it. But putting it into the tree leads to unpleasantnesss, as one ends up with werewolf infected and werewolf natural, etc.[[User:Cure\|Cure]] 06:09, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

			::Agreed. I don't think we need infected and natural (and afflicted!) categories for each phenotype. A single label is fine. the point with the "Tree" is that every "folder" fits completely in every folder above it. So, since it's obviously true that all infected lycanthropes are lycanthropes, it's OK to put it there. Since only ''some'' infected lycanthropes are werewolves, it should NOT go in the werewolf category. But if, for example, Gennifer W-F is tagged with both werewolf and infected lycanthrope, (and human) both paths up the lycanthrope branch of the tree end up in the same place, so it's fine. The goal is that you can start at GWF's page and go up the tree as far as you like and you shouldn't find any category that she doesn't fit into. -- [[User:Gonzoron\|Gonzoron]] 19:11, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Cure at 06:09, 9 March 2010

2010-03-09T06:09:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:09, 9 March 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	A note... I would love to put this into Category:Humanoid, but by the RAW, (in 3.x) Lycanthropes can be humanoids OR giants. So it doesn't fit cleanly in either place. -- [[User:Gonzoron\|Gonzoron]] 18:37, 16 February 2010 (UTC)		A note... I would love to put this into Category:Humanoid, but by the RAW, (in 3.x) Lycanthropes can be humanoids OR giants. So it doesn't fit cleanly in either place. -- [[User:Gonzoron\|Gonzoron]] 18:37, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

			::For my two wolf's fangs, I would put it in both with a note. Not every category can fit perfectly and the criteria should not be perfection but rather usability.[[User:Cure\|Cure]] 06:09, 9 March 2010 (UTC)


	I don't see any easy way of adding infected lycanthrope. Not worth the bother?[[User:Cure\|Cure]] 19:55, 6 March 2010 (UTC)		I don't see any easy way of adding infected lycanthrope. Not worth the bother?[[User:Cure\|Cure]] 19:55, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

	:Well, we can easily make a [[:Category:Infected Lycanthrope]], put it under [[:Category:Lycanthrope]], and then tag the relevant NPC's. Is that a problem somehow? -- [[User:Gonzoron\|Gonzoron]] 14:41, 8 March 2010 (UTC)		:Well, we can easily make a [[:Category:Infected Lycanthrope]], put it under [[:Category:Lycanthrope]], and then tag the relevant NPC's. Is that a problem somehow? -- [[User:Gonzoron\|Gonzoron]] 14:41, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

			:I was thinking it should fit into the tree, rather than stand beside it. But putting it into the tree leads to unpleasantnesss, as one ends up with werewolf infected and werewolf natural, etc.[[User:Cure\|Cure]] 06:09, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Gonzoron at 14:41, 8 March 2010

2010-03-08T14:41:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:41, 8 March 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	A note... I would love to put this into Category:Humanoid, but by the RAW, (in 3.x) Lycanthropes can be humanoids OR giants. So it doesn't fit cleanly in either place. -- [[User:Gonzoron\|Gonzoron]] 18:37, 16 February 2010 (UTC)		A note... I would love to put this into Category:Humanoid, but by the RAW, (in 3.x) Lycanthropes can be humanoids OR giants. So it doesn't fit cleanly in either place. -- [[User:Gonzoron\|Gonzoron]] 18:37, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

			I don't see any easy way of adding infected lycanthrope. Not worth the bother?[[User:Cure\|Cure]] 19:55, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

			:Well, we can easily make a [[:Category:Infected Lycanthrope]], put it under [[:Category:Lycanthrope]], and then tag the relevant NPC's. Is that a problem somehow? -- [[User:Gonzoron\|Gonzoron]] 14:41, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Gonzoron: Created page with 'A note... I would love to put this into Category:Humanoid, but by the RAW, (in 3.x) Lycanthropes can be humanoids OR giants. So it doesn't fit cleanly in either place. -- ~~~~'

2010-02-16T18:37:28Z

Created page with 'A note... I would love to put this into Category:Humanoid, but by the RAW, (in 3.x) Lycanthropes can be humanoids OR giants. So it doesn't fit cleanly in either place. -- ~~~~'

New page

A note... I would love to put this into Category:Humanoid, but by the RAW, (in 3.x) Lycanthropes can be humanoids OR giants. So it doesn't fit cleanly in either place. -- [[User:Gonzoron|Gonzoron]] 18:37, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:12, 19 April 2010
Line 12:		Line 12:
	::Agreed. I don't think we need infected and natural (and afflicted!) categories for each phenotype. A single label is fine. the point with the "Tree" is that every "folder" fits completely in every folder above it. So, since it's obviously true that all infected lycanthropes are lycanthropes, it's OK to put it there. Since only ''some'' infected lycanthropes are werewolves, it should NOT go in the werewolf category. But if, for example, Gennifer W-F is tagged with both werewolf and infected lycanthrope, (and human) both paths up the lycanthrope branch of the tree end up in the same place, so it's fine. The goal is that you can start at GWF's page and go up the tree as far as you like and you shouldn't find any category that she doesn't fit into. -- [[User:Gonzoron\|Gonzoron]] 19:11, 9 March 2010 (UTC)		::Agreed. I don't think we need infected and natural (and afflicted!) categories for each phenotype. A single label is fine. the point with the "Tree" is that every "folder" fits completely in every folder above it. So, since it's obviously true that all infected lycanthropes are lycanthropes, it's OK to put it there. Since only ''some'' infected lycanthropes are werewolves, it should NOT go in the werewolf category. But if, for example, Gennifer W-F is tagged with both werewolf and infected lycanthrope, (and human) both paths up the lycanthrope branch of the tree end up in the same place, so it's fine. The goal is that you can start at GWF's page and go up the tree as far as you like and you shouldn't find any category that she doesn't fit into. -- [[User:Gonzoron\|Gonzoron]] 19:11, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

	Mangrum's Lore needs to be cleaned up a bit further as it was not penned exclusively for Ravenloft (http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19546370/Monster_Lore_Compendium?post_id=332153698#332153698). In particular the conditions for a cure need to corrected. Note that I left the full moon stuff, as perhaps only at higher DC's does one realise that the literature ~~support~~ many different ~~triggeer~~ conditions.[[User:Cure\|Cure]]		Mangrum's Lore needs to be cleaned up a bit further as it was not penned exclusively for Ravenloft (http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19546370/Monster_Lore_Compendium?post_id=332153698#332153698). In particular the conditions for a cure need to corrected. Note that I left the full moon stuff, as perhaps only at higher DC's does one realise that the literature supports many different trigger conditions.[[User:Cure\|Cure]]

	Mangrum already noted on that thread that the chemical allergen part and the "full details of the cleansing cure" part are Ravenloft-specific. Since Mistipedia is Ravenloft-specific, I see no need to highlight them as he did by underlining. So I think its fine as is, no? -- [[User:Gonzoron\|Gonzoron]] 14:12, 19 April 2010 (UTC)		Mangrum already noted on that thread that the chemical allergen part and the "full details of the cleansing cure" part are Ravenloft-specific. Since Mistipedia is Ravenloft-specific, I see no need to highlight them as he did by underlining. So I think its fine as is, no? -- [[User:Gonzoron\|Gonzoron]] 14:12, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

			:I missed the full ritual stuff at the end. I did add "with luck" as success is not assured in Ravenloft.[[User:Cure\|Cure]] 15:12, 19 April 2010 (UTC)