Category talk:Wolf - Revision history

Cure at 20:15, 22 February 2010

2010-02-22T20:15:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:15, 22 February 2010
Line 6:		Line 6:

	That would work, but doesn't address the animal/magical beast overlap. What do you think of [[:category:Wolf Animal]] and [[:category:Wolf Magical Beast]]? (or [[:category:Wolf (Animal)]] and [[:category:Wolf (Magical Beast)]]?) -- [[User:Gonzoron\|Gonzoron]] 19:59, 22 February 2010 (UTC)		That would work, but doesn't address the animal/magical beast overlap. What do you think of [[:category:Wolf Animal]] and [[:category:Wolf Magical Beast]]? (or [[:category:Wolf (Animal)]] and [[:category:Wolf (Magical Beast)]]?) -- [[User:Gonzoron\|Gonzoron]] 19:59, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

			I had gotten used to the overlap. Perhaps like one gets used to a toothache. Still, there is something intriscally nice about seeing all the cats together, regardless of whether they have Intelligence 2 or Intelligence 10. Animal and Magic Beast is a very arbitary division in a world whether few who are likely to make the distinction (essentially only druids and casters of spells targetting animals), so straddling the categories seem correct to me unless I am missing some other problem that is about to raise its ugly head.[[User:Cure\|Cure]] 20:15, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Gonzoron at 19:59, 22 February 2010

2010-02-22T19:59:24Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:59, 22 February 2010
Line 4:		Line 4:

	Wolflike might include wolf-headed demons. What about naming the basic animal wolf the Common Wolf?[[User:Cure\|Cure]] 19:16, 22 February 2010 (UTC)		Wolflike might include wolf-headed demons. What about naming the basic animal wolf the Common Wolf?[[User:Cure\|Cure]] 19:16, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

			That would work, but doesn't address the animal/magical beast overlap. What do you think of [[:category:Wolf Animal]] and [[:category:Wolf Magical Beast]]? (or [[:category:Wolf (Animal)]] and [[:category:Wolf (Magical Beast)]]?) -- [[User:Gonzoron\|Gonzoron]] 19:59, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Cure at 19:16, 22 February 2010

2010-02-22T19:16:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:16, 22 February 2010
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Yes, it is a conundrum. What do you say to leaving Wolf as actual normal Wolves, and making [[:category:Wolflike]] for all the other wolflike creatures? Alternatively, what about splitting them into [[:category:Wolf Animal]] and [[:category:Wolf Magical Beast]]? (either way, the same solution should be applied to Bat, Cat, etc..) -- [[User:Gonzoron\|Gonzoron]] 17:22, 22 February 2010 (UTC)		Yes, it is a conundrum. What do you say to leaving Wolf as actual normal Wolves, and making [[:category:Wolflike]] for all the other wolflike creatures? Alternatively, what about splitting them into [[:category:Wolf Animal]] and [[:category:Wolf Magical Beast]]? (either way, the same solution should be applied to Bat, Cat, etc..) -- [[User:Gonzoron\|Gonzoron]] 17:22, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

			Wolflike might include wolf-headed demons. What about naming the basic animal wolf the Common Wolf?[[User:Cure\|Cure]] 19:16, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Gonzoron at 17:22, 22 February 2010

2010-02-22T17:22:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:22, 22 February 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I think Wolf creates a problem, since it is a category spaning Animal and Magical Beast, but is itself a creature that goes in Animal.[[User:Cure\|Cure]] 07:19, 18 February 2010 (UTC)		I think Wolf creates a problem, since it is a category spaning Animal and Magical Beast, but is itself a creature that goes in Animal.[[User:Cure\|Cure]] 07:19, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

			Yes, it is a conundrum. What do you say to leaving Wolf as actual normal Wolves, and making [[:category:Wolflike]] for all the other wolflike creatures? Alternatively, what about splitting them into [[:category:Wolf Animal]] and [[:category:Wolf Magical Beast]]? (either way, the same solution should be applied to Bat, Cat, etc..) -- [[User:Gonzoron\|Gonzoron]] 17:22, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Cure: Created page with 'I think Wolf creates a problem, since it is a category spaning Animal and Magical Beast, but is itself a creature that goes in Animal.~~~~'

2010-02-18T07:19:27Z

Created page with 'I think Wolf creates a problem, since it is a category spaning Animal and Magical Beast, but is itself a creature that goes in Animal.~~~~'

New page

I think Wolf creates a problem, since it is a category spaning Animal and Magical Beast, but is itself a creature that goes in Animal.[[User:Cure|Cure]] 07:19, 18 February 2010 (UTC)