And again, we return to cities. All those ideas are very good - for a city-based campaign. Noble landlords as hidden owners of slums - this is a quite good topic for Gothic story.Rotipher of the FoS wrote:FWIW, I think the "Everyone-Has-A-Hidden-Dark-Side" angle on Nova Vaasa can be played up more effectively if you assume that, while the country nobles pretend disinterest and snooty contempt for the corruption and vice of the cities, each and every one of them is actually up to his armpits in such corruption. Tristan/Malken's unique in that his dark side and his law-abiding side are entirely segregated from one another, but that doesn't mean the other noble families don't secretly have their fingers in the slums as well. Somebody's got to own the leases on all those squalid, miserable tenements, after all, and someone's raking in the profits -- all under the table, of course; no true noble would ever admit that his wealth comes from something as grubby as (ick!) trade -- from the sweatshops and workhouses and other abusive practices that aren't shady enough for Malken to monopolize.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Widowers'_Houses
There is one problem with this: there was nothing "hidden" about the great nobles of the East. The magnates owned whole towns outright, lock, stock and barrel. They named city councillors and judges etc. But most towns were small, poor and unimportant. The nobles were unimaginably rich compared with the West - they could afford private armies many thousand men strong - but their money was earned in agriculture, not in cities. The nearly only rich cities were those which were middlemen in the grain trade.
This may be difficult to understand for people accustomed to the conditions in the West. When the West developed trade and industry, lands east of Elbe exported grain to feed the new cities of the West. This phenomenon which began in XV/XVI centuries was called "export-led serfdom"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serfdom
http://www.historycooperative.org/journ ... lenyi.html
That is why I suggest dividing Nova Vaasa into two domains: the city and the land, which would form politically one state. The city would remain with Malken as Darklord, and would be ruled by a corrupt and hypocritical oligarchy of city nobles and elite burgeois.
The main topic of the land would be war and treason. I suggested earlier many historical examples of prospective darklords.