LadySoth wrote:Ail wrote:
Yes, saw that one too. I like her in both films, but the lighting and the forest scenes in The Wolfman are more eerie
Yeah agreed, the Wolfman is such a classic! Atmospheric, eerie and great acting and scripting. Along with Bride of Frankenstein and the Mummy, one of the greatest original Universal Horror films ever! (FmeetsW was a cheesy, and light-hearted follow-up, and the Festival of New Wine scene makes it even more of a favorite for me!)
BTW good question bout the shadow/vampire thing. . .

I'm stumped!

Bride of Frankenstein is my favourite of the Frankenstein Universal films, although I haven't seen Abbot and Costello, and the Ghost of F. So I may be missing out. But I love Karloff in the first two movies. There are two scenes I like particularly in this one: 1) the one where the monster meets the hermit, and just up to the point where the hermit recites his prayer and the monster sheds a tear; 2) and the whole scene where the monster meets Doctor Pretorius... mainly for the dialogue.
There are things I wish this film did not have, like the irritating maid that seems to be comic-relif and Dr Pretorius' homunculi, who also seem to 'comic' for this film. But in general, I think it was very good. In comparison, I didn't like Son of Frankenstein that much, although it's generally high-rated too.
Mummy I have yet to see, though
As for 'F meets W', it has poor critics now and then, but I liked the film too. Coming to it after I had seen Young Frankenstein years ago made some difference, as I recognized some of the scenes. Yes, the wine festival is a good one, but I keep confusing it in my mind with the latter's one, which was decidedly more comedic. The bad part in this film, though, is Bela Lugosi's monster

This had a very bad review in
http://www.1000misspenthours.com/, but in general I don't agree with much of the reviewer's opinions. Usually I like these reviews, but other times I think he sees the films too fast and thinks too little.