Category talk:Nationality - Revision history

Gonzoron at 21:38, 2 January 2011

2011-01-02T21:38:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:38, 2 January 2011
Line 10:		Line 10:

	-cure		-cure


			OK, I like the note, though I think that a lot of this stuff should be moved to [[Mistipedia:Categorization Guidelines]], since it's not specific to Nationality. I'll do that (leaving a reference here to there) when I get a chance. -- [[User:Gonzoron\|Gonzoron]] 21:38, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Cure at 17:51, 31 December 2010

2010-12-31T17:51:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:51, 31 December 2010
Line 6:		Line 6:

	I'm fine with the suggestion of using the Inhabitants of ___ to denote where they live now and the nationality to denote where they are from. seems to make perfect sense, and I support it 100%. I don't know about changing Nationality to Origin. I'll have to stew on it for a while. I think Nationality has a lot going for it in terms of intuitiveness, and as a contrast to Ethnicity. There's also the stickyness that Nationality makes sense a subset of society, but I'm not sure that Origin does. Anyone else have thoughts? -- [[User:Gonzoron\|Gonzoron]] 21:05, 28 December 2010 (UTC)		I'm fine with the suggestion of using the Inhabitants of ___ to denote where they live now and the nationality to denote where they are from. seems to make perfect sense, and I support it 100%. I don't know about changing Nationality to Origin. I'll have to stew on it for a while. I think Nationality has a lot going for it in terms of intuitiveness, and as a contrast to Ethnicity. There's also the stickyness that Nationality makes sense a subset of society, but I'm not sure that Origin does. Anyone else have thoughts? -- [[User:Gonzoron\|Gonzoron]] 21:05, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

			I agree that nationality has a lot going for it and I have written a note for it that effectively fixes one of its problems.

			-cure

Gonzoron at 21:05, 28 December 2010

2010-12-28T21:05:34Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:05, 28 December 2010
Line 4:		Line 4:

	-cure		-cure

			I'm fine with the suggestion of using the Inhabitants of ___ to denote where they live now and the nationality to denote where they are from. seems to make perfect sense, and I support it 100%. I don't know about changing Nationality to Origin. I'll have to stew on it for a while. I think Nationality has a lot going for it in terms of intuitiveness, and as a contrast to Ethnicity. There's also the stickyness that Nationality makes sense a subset of society, but I'm not sure that Origin does. Anyone else have thoughts? -- [[User:Gonzoron\|Gonzoron]] 21:05, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Cure at 06:08, 25 December 2010

2010-12-25T06:08:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:08, 25 December 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I am beginning to wonder if Nationality is the right term. First, nationality presumes a state and not every domain has a government. Second, and the actual spur to thought, is the matter of people who emigrate. Take Richten or Ray. They are Darkonian but they are also, respectively, Mordentish and Dementlieuse. Would origin be better? In which case they would only be Darkonian. Combine that with a category such as Inhabiant of Mordent and one has a thorough going solution. Further, the latter part of the suggestion has already been implimented for Falkovnia ([[Category:~~Inhabiant~~ of Falkovnia]]).		I am beginning to wonder if Nationality is the right term. First, nationality presumes a state and not every domain has a government. Second, and the actual spur to thought, is the matter of people who emigrate. Take Richten or Ray. They are Darkonian but they are also, respectively, Mordentish and Dementlieuse. Would origin be better? In which case they would only be Darkonian. Combine that with a category such as Inhabiant of Mordent and one has a thorough going solution. Further, the latter part of the suggestion has already been implimented for Falkovnia (Category:Inhabitants of Falkovnia).

	Thoughs?		Thoughs?

	-cure		-cure

Cure at 05:31, 25 December 2010

2010-12-25T05:31:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:31, 24 December 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I am beginning to wonder if Nationality is the right term. First, nationality presumes a state and not every domain has a government. Second, and the actual spur to thought, is the matter of people who emigrate. Take Richten or Ray. They are Darkonian but they are also, respectively, Mordentish and Dementlieuse. Would origin be better? In which case they would only be Darkonian. Combine that with a category such as Inhabiant of Mordent and one has a thorough going solution. Further, the latter part of the suggestion has already been implimented for Falkovnia ([[Category:~~Inhabiants~~ of Falkovnia]]).		I am beginning to wonder if Nationality is the right term. First, nationality presumes a state and not every domain has a government. Second, and the actual spur to thought, is the matter of people who emigrate. Take Richten or Ray. They are Darkonian but they are also, respectively, Mordentish and Dementlieuse. Would origin be better? In which case they would only be Darkonian. Combine that with a category such as Inhabiant of Mordent and one has a thorough going solution. Further, the latter part of the suggestion has already been implimented for Falkovnia ([[Category:Inhabiant of Falkovnia]]).

	Thoughs?		Thoughs?

	-cure		-cure

Cure: Created page with 'I am beginning to wonder if Nationality is the right term. First, nationality presumes a state and not every domain has a government. Second, and the actual spur to thought, is t…'

2010-12-25T05:22:30Z

Created page with 'I am beginning to wonder if Nationality is the right term. First, nationality presumes a state and not every domain has a government. Second, and the actual spur to thought, is t…'

New page

I am beginning to wonder if Nationality is the right term. First, nationality presumes a state and not every domain has a government. Second, and the actual spur to thought, is the matter of people who emigrate. Take Richten or Ray. They are Darkonian but they are also, respectively, Mordentish and Dementlieuse. Would origin be better? In which case they would only be Darkonian. Combine that with a category such as Inhabiant of Mordent and one has a thorough going solution. Further, the latter part of the suggestion has already been implimented for Falkovnia ([[Category:Inhabiants of Falkovnia]]).

Thoughs?

-cure