Talk:Souragne - Revision history

Cure: ~~

2010-03-12T01:49:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:49, 11 March 2010
Line 2:		Line 2:

	The categories appear in the order they are included in the page's source text. Since each of the <nowiki>{{___-canon}}</nowiki> templates includes the appropriate category tag, when they are "transcluded" in the text, the categories will appear in the same order as the first appearance of each canonicity template. The simplest way to fix this is to include the <nowiki>{{canon}}</nowiki> template as well, and since the canon info should go first (according to the guidelines on the [[Main Page]], all will be well in the category list at the bottom. See what I've done with this [[Souragne]] for an example. -- [[User:Gonzoron\|Gonzoron]] 19:10, 11 March 2010 (UTC)		The categories appear in the order they are included in the page's source text. Since each of the <nowiki>{{___-canon}}</nowiki> templates includes the appropriate category tag, when they are "transcluded" in the text, the categories will appear in the same order as the first appearance of each canonicity template. The simplest way to fix this is to include the <nowiki>{{canon}}</nowiki> template as well, and since the canon info should go first (according to the guidelines on the [[Main Page]], all will be well in the category list at the bottom. See what I've done with this [[Souragne]] for an example. -- [[User:Gonzoron\|Gonzoron]] 19:10, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

			OK, that works. Thanx.[[User:Cure\|Cure]] 01:49, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Gonzoron at 19:10, 11 March 2010

2010-03-11T19:10:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:10, 11 March 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Souragne is, of course, canon. But for evident reasons it will include elements that are non-canon. Now when one looks down to its categories, they are led off with [[Netbook-canon]], which might be accurate of a domain invented wholly by someone in a netbook, but is misleading in this and eventually in a lot of other cases. Sourage is canon augmented by netbook canon. So something more nuanced is need in such cases.		Souragne is, of course, canon. But for evident reasons it will include elements that are non-canon. Now when one looks down to its categories, they are led off with [[Netbook-canon]], which might be accurate of a domain invented wholly by someone in a netbook, but is misleading in this and eventually in a lot of other cases. Sourage is canon augmented by netbook canon. So something more nuanced is need in such cases.

			The categories appear in the order they are included in the page's source text. Since each of the <nowiki>{{___-canon}}</nowiki> templates includes the appropriate category tag, when they are "transcluded" in the text, the categories will appear in the same order as the first appearance of each canonicity template. The simplest way to fix this is to include the <nowiki>{{canon}}</nowiki> template as well, and since the canon info should go first (according to the guidelines on the [[Main Page]], all will be well in the category list at the bottom. See what I've done with this [[Souragne]] for an example. -- [[User:Gonzoron\|Gonzoron]] 19:10, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Cure at 18:20, 11 March 2010

2010-03-11T18:20:45Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:20, 11 March 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Souragne is, of course, canon. But for evident reasons it will include elements that are non-canon. Now when one looks down to its categories, they are led off with [[Netbook ~~Canon~~]], which might be accurate of a domain invented wholly by someone in a netbook, but is misleading in this and eventually in a lot of other cases. Sourage is canon augmented by netbook canon. So something more nuanced is need in such cases.		Souragne is, of course, canon. But for evident reasons it will include elements that are non-canon. Now when one looks down to its categories, they are led off with [[Netbook-canon]], which might be accurate of a domain invented wholly by someone in a netbook, but is misleading in this and eventually in a lot of other cases. Sourage is canon augmented by netbook canon. So something more nuanced is need in such cases.

Cure at 18:15, 11 March 2010

2010-03-11T18:15:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:15, 11 March 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Souragne is, of course, canon. But for evident reasons it will include elements that are non-canon. Now when one looks down to its categories, they are led off with [[Netbook Canon], which might be accurate of a domain invented wholly by someone in a netbook, but is misleading in this and eventually in a lot of other cases. Sourage is canon augmented by netbook canon. So something more nuanced is need in such cases.		Souragne is, of course, canon. But for evident reasons it will include elements that are non-canon. Now when one looks down to its categories, they are led off with [[Netbook Canon]], which might be accurate of a domain invented wholly by someone in a netbook, but is misleading in this and eventually in a lot of other cases. Sourage is canon augmented by netbook canon. So something more nuanced is need in such cases.

Cure: Created page with 'Souragne is, of course, canon. But for evident reasons it will include elements that are non-canon. Now when one looks down to its categories, they are led off with [[Netbook Can…'

2010-03-11T18:12:39Z

Created page with 'Souragne is, of course, canon. But for evident reasons it will include elements that are non-canon. Now when one looks down to its categories, they are led off with [[Netbook Can…'

New page

Souragne is, of course, canon. But for evident reasons it will include elements that are non-canon. Now when one looks down to its categories, they are led off with [[Netbook Canon], which might be accurate of a domain invented wholly by someone in a netbook, but is misleading in this and eventually in a lot of other cases. Sourage is canon augmented by netbook canon. So something more nuanced is need in such cases.