Category talk:Incest Taboo: Difference between revisions
From Mistipedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
DeepShadow (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Please see initial post on matter for reply: [[Category_talk:Advent]][[User:Cure|Cure]] 14:03, 22 April 2010 (UTC) | Please see initial post on matter for reply: [[Category_talk:Advent]][[User:Cure|Cure]] 14:03, 22 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
I don't think that answers this question at all. To wit, why should we allow an essay-like entry like this when the standard has rules against it? [[User:DeepShadow|DeepShadow]] 02:33, 23 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
== Speculation == | |||
If we're going to have the essays, I think they need to be labeled as such. [[User:DeepShadow|DeepShadow]] 02:16, 26 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 20:16, 25 April 2010
So.... why do sociology essays like this belong on Mistipedia and not Wikipedia? -- Gonzoron 13:29, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
Please see initial post on matter for reply: Category_talk:AdventCure 14:03, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
I don't think that answers this question at all. To wit, why should we allow an essay-like entry like this when the standard has rules against it? DeepShadow 02:33, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
Speculation
If we're going to have the essays, I think they need to be labeled as such. DeepShadow 02:16, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
