Category talk:Cursed NPC: Difference between revisions
From Mistipedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Well, both items and people can be cursed, so I went with Cursed Item and Cursed NPC, plus everyone is in effect an NPC.[[User:Cure|Cure]] 04:06, 5 March 2010 (UTC) | Well, both items and people can be cursed, so I went with Cursed Item and Cursed NPC, plus everyone is in effect an NPC.[[User:Cure|Cure]] 04:06, 5 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
This might be a case for treating a category like a "tag" and not a "folder". NPCs can be cursed, Items can be cursed. Heck, locations can be cursed too. Why not just have "Cursed" and let it apply to everything. So Van Richten will have both Cateogries "NPC" and "Cursed" and the Blood Coin will have "Item" and "Cursed", etc. Thoughts? -- [[User:Gonzoron|Gonzoron]] 14:17, 8 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 08:17, 8 March 2010
Shouldn't this just be "cursed?" I mean, we don't have "vampire NPC" or "ghost NPC." DeepShadow 00:32, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
Well, both items and people can be cursed, so I went with Cursed Item and Cursed NPC, plus everyone is in effect an NPC.Cure 04:06, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
This might be a case for treating a category like a "tag" and not a "folder". NPCs can be cursed, Items can be cursed. Heck, locations can be cursed too. Why not just have "Cursed" and let it apply to everything. So Van Richten will have both Cateogries "NPC" and "Cursed" and the Blood Coin will have "Item" and "Cursed", etc. Thoughts? -- Gonzoron 14:17, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
