Category talk:Vampirism: Difference between revisions
Created page with 'Insitution? Disease? Curse? -- ~~~~' |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Insitution? Disease? Curse? -- [[User:Gonzoron|Gonzoron]] 19:08, 15 April 2010 (UTC) | Insitution? Disease? Curse? -- [[User:Gonzoron|Gonzoron]] 19:08, 15 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
I recall Mangrum weighing in on lycanthropy, insisting that it was a curse, in addition to being a disease, on the basis, as I recall, of it being a possible Terror Track, in effect. Well, he put the matter much better. So I would say a curse at least. I guess diseases don't necessarily have to be cureable, so disease is a candidate at least, but I have my doubts. It is a relationship with negative energy rather than a virus/bacteria. It is not an institution, well not unless one sees it spawning a vampire culture. I will grant that it does give rise to a ruler-ruled relationship between vampire and their spawn. Still, I suspect it would be a bit excessive to put it under institution as well.[[User:Cure|Cure]] 00:54, 16 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:54, 15 April 2010
Insitution? Disease? Curse? -- Gonzoron 19:08, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
I recall Mangrum weighing in on lycanthropy, insisting that it was a curse, in addition to being a disease, on the basis, as I recall, of it being a possible Terror Track, in effect. Well, he put the matter much better. So I would say a curse at least. I guess diseases don't necessarily have to be cureable, so disease is a candidate at least, but I have my doubts. It is a relationship with negative energy rather than a virus/bacteria. It is not an institution, well not unless one sees it spawning a vampire culture. I will grant that it does give rise to a ruler-ruled relationship between vampire and their spawn. Still, I suspect it would be a bit excessive to put it under institution as well.Cure 00:54, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
