Category talk:Combat Expertise: Difference between revisions
Created page with 'My gut reaction is against feats as categories. Convince me. -- ~~~~' |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
My gut reaction is against feats as categories. Convince me. -- [[User:Gonzoron|Gonzoron]] 15:34, 25 February 2011 (UTC) | My gut reaction is against feats as categories. Convince me. -- [[User:Gonzoron|Gonzoron]] 15:34, 25 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
Most are probably not categories. But when you have feats that depend on feats as prerequisites there may be a cace for it. Or more precisely, a half-way house of both category and non category. See the below link for the treatment of the chain from Great Cleave, through Cleave, through Power Attack: | |||
[[http://www.fraternityofshadows.com/w/index.php?title=Cleave&redirect=no]] | |||
[[User:Cure|Cure]] 16:02, 2 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
I think I'd rather just see a link on the Great Cleave page saying "Pre-requisite: [[Cleave]]" and maybe a category called "Power Attack Feat Family" (or Tree or Chain) that Great Cleave, Cleave, etc. all fall in. -- [[User:Gonzoron|Gonzoron]] 19:16, 21 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
---- | |||
3 ed & 4 ed feats need to be seperated to restore usefulness to the category of feats. Any thoughts or preferences as to how that should be done? [[User:Cure|Cure]] 16:05, 2 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
I disagree. I think it's fine to keep them all in Category:Feat, just have each feat be in Category:4th Edition or Category:3rd Edition (or both). We already have 2nd and 3rd edition spells in the spell category, no? -- [[User:Gonzoron|Gonzoron]] 19:16, 21 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 13:16, 21 March 2011
My gut reaction is against feats as categories. Convince me. -- Gonzoron 15:34, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
Most are probably not categories. But when you have feats that depend on feats as prerequisites there may be a cace for it. Or more precisely, a half-way house of both category and non category. See the below link for the treatment of the chain from Great Cleave, through Cleave, through Power Attack:
[[1]]
Cure 16:02, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
I think I'd rather just see a link on the Great Cleave page saying "Pre-requisite: Cleave" and maybe a category called "Power Attack Feat Family" (or Tree or Chain) that Great Cleave, Cleave, etc. all fall in. -- Gonzoron 19:16, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
3 ed & 4 ed feats need to be seperated to restore usefulness to the category of feats. Any thoughts or preferences as to how that should be done? Cure 16:05, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
I disagree. I think it's fine to keep them all in Category:Feat, just have each feat be in Category:4th Edition or Category:3rd Edition (or both). We already have 2nd and 3rd edition spells in the spell category, no? -- Gonzoron 19:16, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
