Category talk:Vistani: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:I am beginning to think that we don't. I am tempted to leave the Tasques crossed reference in both Vistani and Society categories, but have no great conviction on the matter. | :I am beginning to think that we don't. I am tempted to leave the Tasques crossed reference in both Vistani and Society categories, but have no great conviction on the matter. | ||
Ron, could you take a look at Category:Vistani please. I believe that there are two seperate imports from the Catalogue for Vistani, i.e., Vistani & The Vistani. Unless I created by hand the seprate DoD entry and have forgotten about it. | Ron, could you take a look at Category:Vistani please. I believe that there are two seperate imports from the Catalogue for Vistani, i.e., Vistani & The Vistani. Unless I created by hand the seprate DoD entry and have forgotten about it.[[User:Cure|Cure]] 20:44, 12 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
Yeah, it looks like the catalogue has "Vistani" as the "monster" and "The Vistani" as the "Society". You've combined them into one. I suppose the case could be made that since the wiki allows an entry to be both a society and monster that we could combine them into one page. Or we could keep them separate. I'm not sure which I prefer... -- [[User:Gonzoron|Gonzoron]] 23:53, 12 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 17:53, 12 February 2010
Do we need to distinguish the Vistani race from the Vistani society? -- Gonzoron 20:26, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
- I am beginning to think that we don't. I am tempted to leave the Tasques crossed reference in both Vistani and Society categories, but have no great conviction on the matter.
Ron, could you take a look at Category:Vistani please. I believe that there are two seperate imports from the Catalogue for Vistani, i.e., Vistani & The Vistani. Unless I created by hand the seprate DoD entry and have forgotten about it.Cure 20:44, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
Yeah, it looks like the catalogue has "Vistani" as the "monster" and "The Vistani" as the "Society". You've combined them into one. I suppose the case could be made that since the wiki allows an entry to be both a society and monster that we could combine them into one page. Or we could keep them separate. I'm not sure which I prefer... -- Gonzoron 23:53, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
