Category talk:Planar Wound: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
See the description (posted by Cure after your comment). I'm ok with the category, but the name seems a bit loaded. Maybe Planar Disruption instead? Anyone have time to peek in VRGtF and/or The Shadow Rift or somewhere to see how its described in the text? -- [[User:Gonzoron|Gonzoron]] 12:11, 20 April 2010 (UTC) | See the description (posted by Cure after your comment). I'm ok with the category, but the name seems a bit loaded. Maybe Planar Disruption instead? Anyone have time to peek in VRGtF and/or The Shadow Rift or somewhere to see how its described in the text? -- [[User:Gonzoron|Gonzoron]] 12:11, 20 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
I'm in favor of "disruption." Also, freaks as a subcat of Twisting violates the containment rule of categories: freaks are not a type of planar wound. IMHO, they should not be a subcategory of the twisting at all. They are (by)products of the twisting. [[User:DeepShadow|DeepShadow]] 02:09, 23 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
I'll send the freaks packing later today or tomorrow. I am not married to the term wound. I believe the source for it was a description of the Shadow Rift in Gaz V where the black Mist sealing its top is described as a scab on a wound, but memory can be very inexact.[[User:Cure|Cure]] 07:05, 23 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
Cure's right, the phrase "planar wound" is used in Gaz V's Gwydion section to describe the rift, but nothing in VRGtF or RLPH's sections on reality wrinkles uses anything so violent: warping, imprefection, disturbance, etc.. So maybe the Rift is a "planar wound" but it's probably the only one, so let's go with disruption as the broader category name. -- [[User:Gonzoron|Gonzoron]] 15:15, 26 May 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 09:15, 26 May 2010
What is a "planar wound"?! DeepShadow 02:41, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
See the description (posted by Cure after your comment). I'm ok with the category, but the name seems a bit loaded. Maybe Planar Disruption instead? Anyone have time to peek in VRGtF and/or The Shadow Rift or somewhere to see how its described in the text? -- Gonzoron 12:11, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
I'm in favor of "disruption." Also, freaks as a subcat of Twisting violates the containment rule of categories: freaks are not a type of planar wound. IMHO, they should not be a subcategory of the twisting at all. They are (by)products of the twisting. DeepShadow 02:09, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
I'll send the freaks packing later today or tomorrow. I am not married to the term wound. I believe the source for it was a description of the Shadow Rift in Gaz V where the black Mist sealing its top is described as a scab on a wound, but memory can be very inexact.Cure 07:05, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
Cure's right, the phrase "planar wound" is used in Gaz V's Gwydion section to describe the rift, but nothing in VRGtF or RLPH's sections on reality wrinkles uses anything so violent: warping, imprefection, disturbance, etc.. So maybe the Rift is a "planar wound" but it's probably the only one, so let's go with disruption as the broader category name. -- Gonzoron 15:15, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
