Category talk:Wolf: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Wolflike might include wolf-headed demons. What about naming the basic animal wolf the Common Wolf?[[User:Cure|Cure]] 19:16, 22 February 2010 (UTC) | Wolflike might include wolf-headed demons. What about naming the basic animal wolf the Common Wolf?[[User:Cure|Cure]] 19:16, 22 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
That would work, but doesn't address the animal/magical beast overlap. What do you think of [[:category:Wolf Animal]] and [[:category:Wolf Magical Beast]]? (or [[:category:Wolf (Animal)]] and [[:category:Wolf (Magical Beast)]]?) -- [[User:Gonzoron|Gonzoron]] 19:59, 22 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:59, 22 February 2010
I think Wolf creates a problem, since it is a category spaning Animal and Magical Beast, but is itself a creature that goes in Animal.Cure 07:19, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
Yes, it is a conundrum. What do you say to leaving Wolf as actual normal Wolves, and making category:Wolflike for all the other wolflike creatures? Alternatively, what about splitting them into category:Wolf Animal and category:Wolf Magical Beast? (either way, the same solution should be applied to Bat, Cat, etc..) -- Gonzoron 17:22, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
Wolflike might include wolf-headed demons. What about naming the basic animal wolf the Common Wolf?Cure 19:16, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
That would work, but doesn't address the animal/magical beast overlap. What do you think of category:Wolf Animal and category:Wolf Magical Beast? (or category:Wolf (Animal) and category:Wolf (Magical Beast)?) -- Gonzoron 19:59, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
