Talk:Richemulot: Difference between revisions
From Mistipedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
DeepShadow (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Yeah, that was my understanding, too. I suppose if there's a disagreement, we should probably go with neither. Does it need an analog?[[User:DeepShadow|DeepShadow]] 20:25, 28 December 2011 (MST) | :Yeah, that was my understanding, too. I suppose if there's a disagreement, we should probably go with neither. Does it need an analog?[[User:DeepShadow|DeepShadow]] 20:25, 28 December 2011 (MST) | ||
::Doesn't ''need'' one, no. But in this case, I thought it was pretty clear. I can't think of a single "Italian" thing about Richmulot (i.e. Rich Field Mouse in '''French'''). I'm switching it. If anyone disagrees, take it up here. -- [[User:Admin|Admin]] 10:44, 29 December 2011 (MST) | |||
Latest revision as of 11:44, 29 December 2011
Florentine Italy? Isn't it pretty accepted that Richmulot is rural France? -- Gonzoron 16:47, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, that was my understanding, too. I suppose if there's a disagreement, we should probably go with neither. Does it need an analog?DeepShadow 20:25, 28 December 2011 (MST)
- Doesn't need one, no. But in this case, I thought it was pretty clear. I can't think of a single "Italian" thing about Richmulot (i.e. Rich Field Mouse in French). I'm switching it. If anyone disagrees, take it up here. -- Admin 10:44, 29 December 2011 (MST)
