Van Richten's Guide to the Mists (Book): Difference between revisions

From Mistipedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Cure (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Cure (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
There is some question as to whether this work should be consider canon, less for the manner of its release, than for its very topic which designers had made an express decision to leave in obscurity. Additionally, it has been pointed out that [[Oubilette | oubilettes]] violate the existing topological rules of the the Demiplane (''i.e.'' anything that is carved out of the [[Mists]] has a [[Darklord]]).
There is some question as to whether this work should be consider canon, less for the manner of its release, than for its very topic which designers had made an express decision to leave in obscurity. Additionally, it has been pointed out that [[Oubliette | oubilettes]] violate the existing topological rules of the the Demiplane (''i.e.'' anything that is carved out of the [[Mists]] has a [[Darklord]]).


[[Category:Source]]
[[Category:Source]]

Revision as of 19:13, 19 February 2010

There is some question as to whether this work should be consider canon, less for the manner of its release, than for its very topic which designers had made an express decision to leave in obscurity. Additionally, it has been pointed out that oubilettes violate the existing topological rules of the the Demiplane (i.e. anything that is carved out of the Mists has a Darklord).