Category talk:Lycanthrope: Difference between revisions
From Mistipedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A note... I would love to put this into Category:Humanoid, but by the RAW, (in 3.x) Lycanthropes can be humanoids OR giants. So it doesn't fit cleanly in either place. -- [[User:Gonzoron|Gonzoron]] 18:37, 16 February 2010 (UTC) | A note... I would love to put this into Category:Humanoid, but by the RAW, (in 3.x) Lycanthropes can be humanoids OR giants. So it doesn't fit cleanly in either place. -- [[User:Gonzoron|Gonzoron]] 18:37, 16 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
::For my two wolf's fangs, I would put it in both with a note. Not every category can fit perfectly and the criteria should not be perfection but rather usability.[[User:Cure|Cure]] 06:09, 9 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
I don't see any easy way of adding infected lycanthrope. Not worth the bother?[[User:Cure|Cure]] 19:55, 6 March 2010 (UTC) | I don't see any easy way of adding infected lycanthrope. Not worth the bother?[[User:Cure|Cure]] 19:55, 6 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
:Well, we can easily make a [[:Category:Infected Lycanthrope]], put it under [[:Category:Lycanthrope]], and then tag the relevant NPC's. Is that a problem somehow? -- [[User:Gonzoron|Gonzoron]] 14:41, 8 March 2010 (UTC) | :Well, we can easily make a [[:Category:Infected Lycanthrope]], put it under [[:Category:Lycanthrope]], and then tag the relevant NPC's. Is that a problem somehow? -- [[User:Gonzoron|Gonzoron]] 14:41, 8 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
:I was thinking it should fit into the tree, rather than stand beside it. But putting it into the tree leads to unpleasantnesss, as one ends up with werewolf infected and werewolf natural, etc.[[User:Cure|Cure]] 06:09, 9 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:09, 9 March 2010
A note... I would love to put this into Category:Humanoid, but by the RAW, (in 3.x) Lycanthropes can be humanoids OR giants. So it doesn't fit cleanly in either place. -- Gonzoron 18:37, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
- For my two wolf's fangs, I would put it in both with a note. Not every category can fit perfectly and the criteria should not be perfection but rather usability.Cure 06:09, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
I don't see any easy way of adding infected lycanthrope. Not worth the bother?Cure 19:55, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
- Well, we can easily make a Category:Infected Lycanthrope, put it under Category:Lycanthrope, and then tag the relevant NPC's. Is that a problem somehow? -- Gonzoron 14:41, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
- I was thinking it should fit into the tree, rather than stand beside it. But putting it into the tree leads to unpleasantnesss, as one ends up with werewolf infected and werewolf natural, etc.Cure 06:09, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
