Category talk:Planar Wound: Difference between revisions
From Mistipedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
DeepShadow (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
See the description (posted by Cure after your comment). I'm ok with the category, but the name seems a bit loaded. Maybe Planar Disruption instead? Anyone have time to peek in VRGtF and/or The Shadow Rift or somewhere to see how its described in the text? -- [[User:Gonzoron|Gonzoron]] 12:11, 20 April 2010 (UTC) | See the description (posted by Cure after your comment). I'm ok with the category, but the name seems a bit loaded. Maybe Planar Disruption instead? Anyone have time to peek in VRGtF and/or The Shadow Rift or somewhere to see how its described in the text? -- [[User:Gonzoron|Gonzoron]] 12:11, 20 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
I'm in favor of "disruption." Also, freaks as a subcat of Twisting violates the containment rule of categories: freaks are not a type of planar wound. IMHO, they should not be a subcategory of the twisting at all. They are (by)products of the twisting. [[User:DeepShadow|DeepShadow]] 02:09, 23 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:09, 22 April 2010
What is a "planar wound"?! DeepShadow 02:41, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
See the description (posted by Cure after your comment). I'm ok with the category, but the name seems a bit loaded. Maybe Planar Disruption instead? Anyone have time to peek in VRGtF and/or The Shadow Rift or somewhere to see how its described in the text? -- Gonzoron 12:11, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
I'm in favor of "disruption." Also, freaks as a subcat of Twisting violates the containment rule of categories: freaks are not a type of planar wound. IMHO, they should not be a subcategory of the twisting at all. They are (by)products of the twisting. DeepShadow 02:09, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
