Kartakass: Beginnings OOC Thread

BigBadQDaddy · Post by **BigBadQDaddy** » Wed Mar 11, 2009 12:00 am

My bad, I wasn't sure what Tarlyn had told Pietro, hence the assuming line of questioning.

Ail · Post by **Ail** » Wed Mar 11, 2009 8:01 am

tarlyn wrote:BBQD actually Tarlyn only mentioned he had items, never what they were A lil identifyin is coming up, I gather?

Hope one of you has the Van Richten's Arsenal

I have it somewhere, but not with me atm.

BigBadQDaddy · Post by **BigBadQDaddy** » Wed Mar 11, 2009 10:19 am

I have it if you need something referenced.

steveflam · Post by **steveflam** » Wed Mar 11, 2009 11:03 am

I do too. I just didn't feel like typing out anything from itr LMAO!

BigBadQDaddy · Post by **BigBadQDaddy** » Wed Mar 11, 2009 11:14 am

lol, nice.

ewancummins · Post by **ewancummins** » Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:09 pm

tarlyn wrote:Bullets, potions and ring are magic.

Cornelius will attempt to identify the items.

steveflam · Post by **steveflam** » Thu Mar 12, 2009 6:44 am

Keep you all in suspense until this evening

steveflam · Post by **steveflam** » Thu Mar 12, 2009 6:18 pm

Once Cornelius identifies the objects he discovers the following:

Personally I like the 2nd edition approach to the Identify spell. Ewan will probably agree with me on this. It's way too easy with the 3.5 version spell.

P.S - Where's Wraithform or Chariot of Sustarre in 3.5?????

Okay so enough of my ranting, as this is the result of the identifications:

Bullets are +1.
All 4 potions are Potions of Quintessence [3d8 hp]
Ring: 3 x day [Black Tentacles - P,S another rant they removed names
from spells in 3.5

]
: Blink 2 x day

The ring is one of my own invention so sue me!

Ail · Post by **Ail** » Thu Mar 12, 2009 6:41 pm

tarlyn wrote:Once Cornelius identifies the objects he discovers the following:

Personally I like the 2nd edition approach to the Identify spell. Ewan will probably agree with me on this. It's way too easy with the 3.5 version spell.

P.S - Where's Wraithform or Chariot of Sustarre in 3.5?????

Okay so enough of my ranting, as this is the result of the identifications:

Bullets are +1.
All 4 potions are Potions of Quintessence [3d8 hp]
Ring: 3 x day [Black Tentacles - P,S another rant they removed names
from spells in 3.5 ]
: Blink 2 x day

The ring is one of my own invention so sue me!

Hey Tarlyn,

it's not like they've removed the names. They still exist in D&D 3.5. They've just taken it off D20 SRD because of copyright on the characters. But you can still say Evard's Black Tentacles if you wish, that's what comes in my PHB... or, better yet, prefix it with a mage's name of your own

After all, these names don't make much sense for those of us who've never player GH or AD&D 1st, I guess...

VAN · Post by **VAN** » Thu Mar 12, 2009 6:44 pm

Well, I always use the names! I have learnt the spells as Bigby's, Evard's, Leomuld's etc I like these names!

steveflam · Post by **steveflam** » Thu Mar 12, 2009 7:42 pm

Ail wrote:
tarlyn wrote:Once Cornelius identifies the objects he discovers the following:

Personally I like the 2nd edition approach to the Identify spell. Ewan will probably agree with me on this. It's way too easy with the 3.5 version spell.

P.S - Where's Wraithform or Chariot of Sustarre in 3.5?????

Okay so enough of my ranting, as this is the result of the identifications:

Bullets are +1.
All 4 potions are Potions of Quintessence [3d8 hp]
Ring: 3 x day [Black Tentacles - P,S another rant they removed names
from spells in 3.5 ]
: Blink 2 x day

The ring is one of my own invention so sue me!
Hey Tarlyn,

it's not like they've removed the names. They still exist in D&D 3.5. They've just taken it off D20 SRD because of copyright on the characters. But you can still say Evard's Black Tentacles if you wish, that's what comes in my PHB... or, better yet, prefix it with a mage's name of your own

After all, these names don't make much sense for those of us who've never player GH or AD&D 1st, I guess...

True but if you look in the book there are no names, so sue me

~~

Ail · Post by **Ail** » Fri Mar 13, 2009 4:45 am

tarlyn wrote:
True but if you look in the book there are no names, so sue me ~~

I don't know which book you're reading, but mine has them.

steveflam · Post by **steveflam** » Fri Mar 13, 2009 5:04 am

Evard is gone from the black tentacles.

A G Thing · Post by **A G Thing** » Fri Mar 13, 2009 2:49 pm

tarlyn wrote...
Evard is gone from the black tentacles.

Your copy must be odd in some fashion tarlyn because I have it listed as "Evard's Black Tentacles" as the name listed in my 3.5 PHB. Bigby, Mordenkainen, Otiluke, ect are all still heading the spells in my PHB so perhaps there where different printings?
Or as Ali said are you maybe refering to a different book maybe?

I guess as long as we know what the spell is it does not matter to much!

VAN · Post by **VAN** » Sat Mar 14, 2009 7:39 am

Actually my copy of SRD doesn't have the names either, but the old PHB have them.

Café de Nuit

Welcome, friends, to our establishment.

Kartakass: Beginnings OOC Thread