Joël of the FoS wrote: I think we are now setted as to the fate of the RL setting in 4e, no?
Abandoned or not, we do a great job of keeping the setting alive.




What? You don't like the idea of Strahd now having tentacles and living under the Sea of Sorrows?The Giamarga wrote:Did you guys see what they did to FR? I say let WotC abandon RL, thank you very much. This way at least they can't blow it up.


How very Lovecraftean, a vampiric half-kraken Strahd. Now how many levels of Dark Powers would he have?Joël of the FoS wrote:What? You don't like the idea of Strahd now having tentacles and living under the Sea of Sorrows?The Giamarga wrote:Did you guys see what they did to FR? I say let WotC abandon RL, thank you very much. This way at least they can't blow it up.
I'm really beginning to think much of this criticism is undue. I don't really think 30 levels is that scary. As a matter of fact, the 20 level structure is not even the oldest one. In D&D times, there was a box for 1-3 levels, another for levels 4-14, another for 15-24 (iirc) and two others that led players into the 50s. Now, really, it seems that most of the newest users around are deeply conservative, when it really should be the other way around. They want to keep everything as it is, unchanged, fixed in stone. And there are even some simply that take as canon whatever the FoS and the fans produce, as some people did with the Kargatane before FoS. Now, really, do you truly believe that the WotC writers are not fans of the settings? Heck, they've been playing D&D in all its variants for decades, not years, and like it or not, they have a broader and more dynamic view of it than we do. And the game does need to change in order to outlive us. If an edition is exhausted, and it does happen, and can be eventually traced by a decrease in sales, then something has to change.eldervampire wrote:Hello all,
It has been some time since my last visit to those in the mists.
I have missed these pages and now that my life has returned to me, I am looking to find a new group to wander with.
Here are my thoughts about 4th. PPPPTTTTHHHHFFFFFTTTT!!!!!!!!!!
This seems nothing more than a new way to generate a revenue stream to me and begs for the gaming community at large to give WoTc the one finger salute. I mean really, is there a need for a new system? Not really.
Have they run out of Ideas for "complete" books. (Barring if they publish a complete marketing book) pretty close. I know of many who stuck by 2nd and later found that while 3/3.5 took some getting used to it was a worthy upgrade. I fear for the structure of the game, the 30 level thing is a little scary. 10 levels of racial and 20 of class. HMMMMM.......
OK, I feel better now. I am truly sorry if I offended anyone here. That is not my intent. And I apologize in advance if I have.



I don't know how much WotC had to do with that. They might have asked for too much or WW itself could have decided not to. We've never found out for sure.HuManBing wrote:I hate to be negative but again I agree with more or less everything you say. Wizards hasn't done much to endear itself to me and they allowed the one thing that they did well for Ravenloft - the White Wolf license - to end.
One solution is to let Wizards buy or take over Fraternity. After that you'd probably see a considerable downturn in the number of anti-WotC opinions here.

I was thinking that I'll probably buy only the 4e PHB, so that I may play in new games but will still DM games in 3.5e. I don't really want to buy into a new edition but I'd still like to stay in-step with the hobby's development. So buying the 4e PHB is a good compromise.Lucius wrote:Talking about the 4th ed. I will buy the core rulebooks, but I must confess that I don´t plan to use the new edition in my Ravenloft campaign
